Friday, February 5, 2016

TALEBAN : A 1997 Paper by Prof. M.Maimul Ahsan Khan of Dhaka University

[It is an English translation of a paper presented on 6th June 1997 at a seminar organized by Council of Islamic Revolutionaries of Bangladesh (CIRB-HEZBOLLAH).  Dr. Khan did his Ph.D. from Tashkent University, former USSR. He is one of the leading Bengali Scholars on Central Asian affairs. During Soviet occupation he visited Afghanistan many times. He is a Professor of Law of Dhaka University]

More than two decades Afghanistan occupies special place in international politics.  The Russian forces  have ruled greater land and people of Central Asia for more than a century.  But they failed to keep Afghanistan under their rule even for a decade.  In explanations, often Western military assistance is highlighted and victory of the Muslim People is belittled.

Defeat of the Russians in Afghanistan is definitely a victory of the Afghan people.  The internecine fights among Afghan groups and sub-groups for control of Kabul was consistent with the interests of both Moscow and Washington, because both are equally worried about the rise of Islamic Fundamentalist authority in Afghanistan. 

Afghanistan was an independent state between Russian and British Empires.  Both the British and Lenin considered that occupation of Afghanistan would be expensive.  In the Spring of 1920 there was a battle between the Russians and the Afghans in the Marv-Kushk region,  which led to a truce between Badsha Amanullah and Lenin in 1921.  Soviet border with Afghanistan was not much guarded -  Muslims could travel across easily.  In the December of 1925  the Russian soldiers crossed Afghan border near Oxus River in the Penjdeh region.  Once again  both sides signed a peace treaty in 1926.  On 15th October 1929 Mohammad Nadir Khan became the new King of Afghanistan.  In June 1930 the Russian soldiers penetrated 40 miles inside Afghan border.  Afghanistan sought help of nearby Muslim states, and  was frustrated as none responded.  Thus Kabul gradually became dependent on Moscow, and from 1936 started procuring Russian arms. 

After the Second World War,  Moscow was dreaming possibilities of  peaceful socialist revolutions in Muslim countries.  With this aim groups of Soviet experts were sent to Afghanistan.  In the 1952 Afghan Parliament Election,  50 members out of 120 were socialists.  In December 1955 Russian Leader Nikita Krushchev visited Afghanistan.  In 1960 Krushchev openly supported Kabul for  Pakhtunistan issue.  

In January 1955 Afghan socialists formed the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA),  which due to internal conflicts was later on divided into 2 groups : "Parcham"  and  "Khalq".   In 1973 Daud captured power in Afghanistan  and  later on in 1977 he declared Socialism as national ideology of Afghanistan.   But neither Kremlin   nor  hardline socialists of Afghanistan were happy with Daud's slow  progress towards socialism.  So, on the 27th April of 1978, Noor Mohammad Taraki was brought to power in Afghanistan.  Kremlin now was claiming that establishment of Socialism in Afghanistan  was almost at final stage.  Kremlin was also expecting victory of Tudeh Party in Iran.  But the Iranian Islamic Revolution bewildered them all. 

Kremlim was very much frustrated by the Iranian Islamic Revolution.  Though the Iranian Islamic Revolution was harshly anti-American yet the Iranian socialists were the most hard-hit by it.  All Soviet research were proved futile.  At the end of 1979 Kremlin resorted to establish full control on Afghanistan by dispatching Soviet Military forces into Afghanistan.  Russians were still expecting that the rise of Islamic Leadership in Iran was temporary,  and  ultimately  socialists would capture state power in Iran. 

On December 28th, 1979, the Soviet Army moved inside Afghanistan.  Large numbers of Muslim civilian population of Central Asian Republics of Soviet Union were also dispatched to Afghanistan.  At that time One Fifth of the Soviet population was Muslim.  Russians were anxious to give the impression that Muslims in the Soviet Union were living in happiness and prosperity along with the Russians.  Out of 15 Soviet Republics, 6 were Muslim Republics.   Officially Afghanistan remained an independent state.  But unofficially  the Russians considered Afghanistan to the their 16th Republic. 

From the beginning, the Soviet Army tried to give an impression that they were not occupation forces.  But the Afghan masses were not convinced.  So, in 1985, Gorbachev after becoming leader of the Soviet  Union brought some strategic changes in Afghan policy.  In 1986  Nazibullah was installed to power in Kabul.  He carefully avoided enthusiasm about socialism,  instead,  started  speaking in favor of   Islam.  In December 1997 a new Constitution for Afghanistan was approved.  Islam was declared as the State-Religion in the new Constitution.  Nazibullah tried compromise formula with the pro-Islamic forces.  Moscow tried to keep their sphere of influence over Afghanistan via Nazibullah.  Their strategy was to promote differences and internecine fights among various Afghan Mujahid groups & sub-groups.  Soon after withdrawal of the Soviet troops from Afghanistan,  inter-group fighting among Mujahids flared  up,  the differences over who will rule on  what principles increased day by day.  After complete withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan,  there were little difference between the policies of American and Soviet Union regarding Afghanistan.  Both Washington and Kremlin wanted continuation of tribal divisions and differences among various Mujahid groups.  Meanwhile, it became impossible for the Soviet Union to survive. Gradually all the Republics of USSR became independent.  The victory of the Afghan Mujahids is surely one of the various factors that led to the liquidation of the Soviet Union.

The Mujahid groups that grew through the fights against the Russians were mainly organized on regional and tribal  affiliations.  The Tajik forces were led by Masud. The Pashtu-Speaking Mujahids were led by Gulbuddin Hekmatian. The Uzbek forces were left to Rashid Dostum.  No major group came forward to resolve the differences and animosity among the various Afghan groups, nationalities and tribes -  as Muslims could not stop the Iran-Iraq and Iraq-Kuwait conflicts.  The West was enjoying the internecine fights in Afghanistan.  The "TALEBAN"  have risen out of this situation.

"TALEBAN" is not a political party.  Nor there was any Mujahid group in this name.  A drop has grown into an ocean unimaginably.  Such is impossible without Divine Blessings.    The inception was with the resistance against some anti-Islamic activities in Kandahar. This resistance movement grew into a mass uprising  against the criminal activities of other Mujahid groups and commanders.  This mass uprising was led by Mullah Omar.  Mollah Omar was a young teacher and majority of his followers were students, i.e. "TALEBANS".  One after another region fell before the Taleban.  Finally they succeeded in occupying Kabul.

Many observers thought the "Taleban Victory" would not last long.  They thought Rabbani or Hekmatiar would soon recapture Kabul.  Reasons for such apprehensions are probably : -

(a)  There were no stable government in Afghanistan since it was freed from Soviet occupation ;

(b)  Whoever formed government in Kabul tried to rule the country by arms.

The Taleban was with the masses and they advanced with the masses from the very beginning.  There was no scarcity of fighters in Afghanistan.  There was no scarcity of skilled operators of arms in Afghanistan.  The only scarcity was of appropriate and organized leadership.  Taleban has fulfilled that need. They led the masses to defeat the deviated  warlords.  The military units of Taleban are not composed of members of any one tribe.  Islam-loving committed fighters of all tribes came together to form the "Taleban" military units.  The battle field   decided who would lead.  On the other hand new forces came to prove their efficiency in administration.  In this way the Talebans succeeded in establishing their authority over Afghanistan including Kabul.  After military victory in any area, the Talebans were successful in establishing peace and discipline in the area.   They successfully put an end to extortion and criminal violence.  It may be mentioned that since the days of  Soviet occupation,  various  non-government  groups and sub-groups were collecting tolls  and taxes parallel  to government collectors.  Taleban has brought an end to such dual collection system. 

The West have aimed their propaganda machinery against the "Talebans".  They are blaming that "Talebans" are  "fundamentalists",  "Talebans" are  disregarding "human rights" ;   "Talebans"  have locked women inside their homes, etc. 

After occupying Kabul, the TALEBANS for some days  maintained intensive watching on movement of people.  Maintaining control on movement of women is not easy.  So, some novel measures were adopted.  Irreligious women might work for the enemies.  So, women were asked not to attend working places.  The West immediately raised such a hew and cry over this issue as if TALEBANS are peculiar creatures who have no mother, no sister, no wife.  TALEBANS have been criticized for putting end to  co-education.  The West is orchestrating  ANTI-TALEBAN propaganda as if TALEBANS are enemies of Afghan people, and  worse than the Russians. 

After the TALEBANS acquired control of Kabul, they attracted the attention of the Muslim world.  The anti-Taleban propaganda in Muslim countries sponsored by government machinery is rare incident.  The criticism faced by the Talebans is much lighter than the criticism  faced by the Iranian Islamic Revolutionaries in their early days after the Revolution.  Afghanistan is largely inhabited by Sunni Muslims.  There is a small Shia population in Bamian region.  The rise of the Taleban is consistent with the awakening in the Muslim World.  Therefore, few Muslim rulers raised voice against Talebans.  The intellectuals, of course, are divided.  Iran openly criticized the Talebans.  Iran argued that hard line attitude of the Talebans might make others afraid of  Islam itself.  Conceding to this argument would mean to accept that Talebans  are driving the Afghans away from Islam.  But this is not true.

For about 2 decades Iran has been branded as an Islamic fundamentalist country.  So, Iran had to face big odds to  maintain external relationship.  By criticizing the Talebans Iran may have been able to raise her acceptability to the West.  On the other hand Talebans have showed appreciable cautiousness.  While the Iranian Islamic Revolutionaries kept their Universities shut for several years,  the Talebans opened Kabul University  within  few months after  Kabul had fallen to the Talebans.  After victory of the Talebans it has become impossible to keep in currency any particular brand of "Islamic Fundamentalism".  It is a great achievement for the Muslim World.  Doors of new opportunities have ushered for Islamic reforms in the Islamic World in different methods and ways.

Talebans are still to consolidate their authority over adjacent areas near the border with former Soviet republics.  Lackeys of Rabbani and Dostam are getting arms and ammunition supplies from across those borders.  Russians are convincing the Central Asian Muslim governments that powerful Islamic Government in Afghanistan could inspire Muslims of newly born Muslim countries of Central Asia to topple the existing governments.  Popularity of Islam is rising day by day in Central Asia.  Russians are afraid of another Islamic Revolution in Central Asia.  They  know what revolution means.  They know that socialists could not survive in Afghanistan because there was no socialist revolution in Afghanistan.  Because the Russians succeeded in having a Socialist Revolution, the Russian Empire survived for another 70 years after the First World War.  Central Asian countries and people have already rejected socialism.  Russians are being condemned and criticized for their past role in Central Asia.  The Russians have not yet been benefited by capitalist economy.  So, the Central Asian Muslim States do not consider capitalist system beneficial.  Thus in those states half-socialist systems are still practiced.  So, the rulers of those states are very much afraid of Taleban Victory.  From the  reactions of the  Central Asian rulers  it may appear that the Central Asian Muslims consider the Talebans to be extremists.  About a decade back, Iran was also treated in the same way.  But now-a-days there is no question  about Iran's acceptability in Central Asia,  though the people are conscious about Shia-Sunni differences.  Iranian practice of "Hijab" or "Purdah" is appreciated by Muslims of Central Asia.  But they are critical about "Taleban" policy towards women.  The reality is that the female population of Afghanistan are not educationally as Western as the female population of Iran and Central Asia.  The previous pro-Russian rulers of Afghanistan reared up a minority of female population of Kabul for extreme non-Islamic lifestyle.  They also introduced for females out-door work culture in towns.   But did not  become mass culture of Afghanistan.  So the policies adopted by the Talebans are  not unrealistic in view of their  own socio-politico perspective.  Rather to protect the Taleban Revolution they need to check the doors through which the bad elements may acquire power to disrupt the revolution.  Fortunately,  common  Afghans are free from anti-Islamic ideologies.   There is a mass consensus in favor of Islamic system of life.  Therefore, if the Talebans can attain peace and uninterrupted authority over whole of Afghanistan,  they will definitely lead Afghanistan towards a great future.  People of Central Asia understands Afghanistan,  her  great  prospects. 

Talebans  introduced very simple administrative system.  They did not try to re-build the broken down previous system.  They  simply appointed new administrators for towns and regions.  Lifestyle of the leaders and administrators is very simple  -  and to run an office they mean to directly conduct the workforce.  The Taleban administration is meaningfully inexpensive and close to mass life.  Islamic spirit and enthusiasm is visible  in every sphere of Afghan life.  Government employees are trying to serve the people.

The people of Afghanistan overwhelmingly welcomed Taleban authority.  Within Afghanistan Taleban authority received necessary recognition.  There have been problem regarding external recognition.  In the absence of any powerful government in Afghanistan  UNO and the West have seen how Afghanistan turned into heaven for the traders of drugs and illegal arms.  None of the previous Kabul Governments were able to effectively control illegal trafficking of drugs,  arms  and  women.   The law and order situation in the regions controlled by Talebans has been excellent.  Scope for committing major vices & crimes have been effectively shut.  The situation is likely to improve further as soon as the whole of Afghanistan comes under Taleban control.  Peaceful Islamic Afghanistan will lay positive impact on all the Central Asian Muslim states.  It  should be remembered  that  the  capitalist  world  has  joined  hand  with  the  Russians  to destroy  the Islamic character  of  the Central Asian Muslim states.  Because the Iranians are Shiiaites and  the Central Asian Muslims are Sunni,  Iran  has been able to  play  only  a  limited  role  in  that  region.

The West  should  understand and concede to the realities in Afghanistan.  The West may try to isolate Afghanistan by imposing blockade and barriers.  But we know,  blockade and barriers against Iran,  Iraq  and  Libya  have not been fruitful.  Instead,  these  Muslim states learned to be self-reliant.   Afghans are accustomed to very simple living.  They  were  never  for  long  in  indignity or subjugation.  Afghanistan  does not  have any  big  luxurious  consumer  class.  There is  hardly  any  class of  Westernized intellectuals of consumerist character.  All  are  equally  busy  for  survival.  It has created an unusual  harmony in Afghanistan.  They are steadily attainting sound national unity.   And  because  Islam  is  the foundation  and  the Talebans  are  simple  and  committed,  all  tribal and communal  differences  are  likely to be resolved  quickly.  In fact,  Talebans may become  example  for the remaining Muslim world.

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Martyred President Saddam Hussein's historic letter to Iran

The 23rd of Muharam, 1411, that corresponds to Aug. 14, 1990 AD.

In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate:

The Respected Mr. Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran:

Putting our trust in the Almighty Allah, we are aiming for the removal of all obstacles in the way of brotherly relations among all Moslems and those who choose brotherhood among Moslems of our neighbor Iran.

We are aiming for opening the way to serious interaction among all believers to confront the evil-doers who wish to bring evil onto all Moslems and the Arab nation, and for pushing Iraq and Iran away from blackmail and evil tricks of the international powers and their agents in the region.

In accordance with the spirit of the initiative we announced on Aug. 12, 1990, through which we sought to establish a comprehensive and lasting peace in the region, we seek to strip those with false apprehensions of their pretexts and stop them from diverting Iraq's potentials away from the noble causes of Moslems and Arabs.

In order to remove confusion from our trenches so that those with good intentions may find the way to normal relations between Iraq and Iran; and as fruit of our direct dialogue which has continued since our letter to you on April 21, 1990, capped by your Aug. 8, 1990, message to us; and as a final, clear-cut solution that disarms all those with pretexts, we have decided the following:

Firstly, we accept your suggestion which came in the answer message dated Aug. 8, 1990 - which was received by our representative in Geneva Mr. Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti from your representative Mr. Syros Nasri - to consider the 1975 agreement as interrelated with the principles stated in our letter of July 7, 1990, specifically in what concerns the exchange of prisoners and Articles 6 and 7 of (U.N.) Resolution 598.

Secondly, on the basis of what is mentioned above and the contents of our message to you on July 7, 1990, we are willing to send an official delegation to Tehran, or receive an official delegation here in Baghdad - at the level that has been agreed upon - to work out details of agreements and prepare for their signing.

Thirdly, as a goodwill gesture our withdrawal will start on Friday Aug. 17, 1990. We will withdraw all our troops which face you along the border, leaving a symbolic presence with the border police units to carry out the routine daily duties of normal circumstances.

Fourthly, an immediate and comprehensive exchange of all prisoners of war held in Iran and Iraq through the border posts of Khanaqin and Qasr-E-Shirin and other border points to be agreed upon. We will take the initiative in this, starting this coming Friday, Aug. 17, 1990.

Brother President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani: in this decision, everything has become clear and everything you have sought and has been focusing on is realized. What is still lacking is circulating the necessary documents so we can look forward to a new life of cooperation on the principles of Islam and respect of each other's rights, so we can deter all those fishing in dirty waters and cooperate to turn the gulf into a lake of peace, free of foreign fleets that harbor ill intentions against us.

Allah is Great and thanks be to Him,

Saddam Hussein,
President of the Republic of Iraq,
The 23rd of Muharam, 1411, that corresponds to Aug. 14, 1990 AD.